Everything the forum is running this session, and what we have run before.
Our flagship annual gathering. Oral and poster presentations judged by faculty, a research quiz, keynote sessions, and awards for the strongest undergraduate work of the year.
Register for this →A practical session on Letter to Editor Workshop 1.0 — taught step by step, with the tools and templates you need to apply it to your own project.
Hands-on session taking you from raw data to results: data cleaning, descriptive statistics, choosing the right test, and reading your own output without guessing.
A practical session on Case Report Workshop 2.0 — taught step by step, with the tools and templates you need to apply it to your own project.
A practical session on Case Report Workshop 1.0 — taught step by step, with the tools and templates you need to apply it to your own project.
A practical session on CDC Wonder Workshop — taught step by step, with the tools and templates you need to apply it to your own project.
The forum’s flagship day: oral and poster presentations judged by faculty, a research quiz, research games and model presentations, with awards for the strongest undergraduate work of the year.
Teams of three test their research knowledge across methodology, biostatistics, ethics and critical appraisal in a fast, buzzer-round evening. Prizes for the winning team.
An intensive online session that takes a small team from a PICO question through searching, screening, data extraction and a pooled estimate in one sitting. Laptops and coffee required.
Tea, a chat and a sign-up sheet. Meet the executive body, hear what the coming semester holds and register your interest in workshops, mentorship and the Olympiad.
A hands-on online workshop on designing a cross-sectional study: framing the question, sampling, the questionnaire, ethical approval and the analysis you will actually run. Bring an idea and leave with a protocol outline.
Three days on study design, framing a research question, literature searching, sampling, and building a protocol that an ethical review board will actually approve.
A drop-in booth where students can find out what the forum does, how research training works at Nishtar and how to get involved. Come with questions; leave with a plan and a mentor’s contact.
In their own words — from workshops, booths and the Olympiad floor.
The Meta-Analysis Marathon was the first time a workshop actually made me finish a protocol. Twelve hours, one dataset, and a pooled estimate by the end of it.
I came to the awareness booth with a vague idea and left with a mentor and a timeline. Three months later we submitted our first abstract.
The quality of the poster session surprised me. Undergraduates defending their methods with confidence — that is exactly what the forum was built for.
NRC-SF · Nishtar Medical University, Multan
Your abstract is now with our review panel. A confirmation has been sent to your email address.
Keep this reference number for all correspondence.
Tell us about yourself and attach your CV. We read every application.